This Week No. 30: Yashica-Mat and selling prints in Denver

The Yashica-Mat
The Yashica-Mat (no LM, no 124, and certainly no G) is a simple TLR with a big crank winder that I’m already in love with. It’s been cold, snowy and overcast in Denver the last week, but that hasn’t stopped me from testing it out. (Daniel J. Schneider)

I acquired a Yashica-Mat TLR, I’ve learned a little more about the Banier, and the craft fair where I’ll be selling prints is almost here.

Let’s dive right in, shall we?


The Yashica-Mat was made from from 1957 until 1971 or 1973. Very few mentions of the production range online, and the existence of the massively popular later 124G model makes finding information about the plain old -Mat version difficult. The sources I could find said it was made until 1971.

The serial number was the key, though, and it appears that serial numbers exist going up into 1973. Based on that site, I believe the serial number of my Yashica-Mat dates it as having been produced in January of 1971.

It came to me in very good condition overall, though it definitely needed some cleaning. The silvering on the mirror is deteriorating a little bit, but it’s still very usable.

The viewing lens is a big f/2.8 Yashinon, so the viewfinder is brighter than my Yashica-A or Yashica-D — both of which have only f/3.5 apertures on the viewing lenses. It’s only a half-stop difference, but it has a surprisingly big impact on the amount of light that gets to the ground glass.

The taking lens is an 80mm f/3.5 Yashinon — a well-respected lens that is superbly sharp at f/4 or f/5.6 and smaller. My other two Yashica TLRs have f/3.5 Yashikor lenses. Yashikor is a 3-element, 3-group design similar to the Zeiss Triotar lenses in the Rolleicords Yashica was copying in the mid 1950s, while the Yashinon is a Tessar copy with four elements in three groups.

Yashica-Mat film advance crank
The crank! The Yashica-Mat features a film advance crank instead of the knobs on many other TLRs. It doesn’t go all the way around, instead you push it forward and down until the frame is advanced fully and it stops, then wind backwards to the stop position to set the shutter for the next exposure. (Daniel J. Schneider)

Instead of the knob on my other two, the Yashica-Mat has a crank advance for the film. The A uses a ruby window, and with the knob to advance and a knob to focus, occasionally the hands get confused and move the film unintentionally. The D can’t be moved accidentally, as the knob and shutter are coupled. Without a ruby window, you just turn the knob until it stops — which works well but is a little slow, as it takes a couple twists to reach the stop.

The crank advance uses some gearing to make it advance a whole frame, while the crank itself movies only about 40 percent of its full rotation. Like the D, the shutter is automatically cocked when the film is fully advanced and the crank returned to its resting position. The crank whips forward and back quickly and smoothly, and is really a joy to use. I’m sold.

Overall, the Yashica-Mat is a better camera than either of the other Yashica TLRs I have — and it was the cheapest. The shutter speed adjust was sticky and the focus knob was messed up and spinning freely when I got it, but a few minutes with Google and a spanner solved both problems right quick. The faster viewing lens, sharper taking lens and truly brilliant crank (my first) have me completely hooked.

Actually, I might swap in the mirror from my Yashica-D and see if the viewfinder gets even brighter… anyone want to buy a beat-up Yashica-D?

The first roll of film from the Banier
The first roll of film from the Banier is ugly. I mean, really ugly. The film is insanely curled and the frames are a total waste of film. (Daniel J. Schneider)

Banier update

Got the film back from my tests on the Banier toy camera I mentioned a couple weeks back.

Inverted frame from Banier
I cropped out and inverted one frame from the Banier. The lines are from the cloth over the lightbox, but you can see how much film it wasted. At least I know you don’t have to turn it. (Daniel J. Schneider)

They’re pretty terrible. Like, amazingly bad. As you can see at right, the mask isn’t remotely straight or smooth, so the pictures aren’t even technically square. It’s some sort of squarish polygon with evidence of burrs and other imperfections all the way around the edges.

It’s not a 6×4.5, by the way. It actually makes approximately 4.5×4.5 centimeter frames on 120 film, so it’s basically a 127 camera. 127 film stock is 46mm wide and most cameras that use it make frames 4 centimeters in one dimension, or both. When you consider the insane and inconsistent vignetting and poor masking, after any necessary cropping to make a decent square, its images are probably no better than the ones from the Imperial Satellite 127.

The negatives were also horrendously curled and wrinkled, probably because I discovered that it was winding the film around the outside of the top end of the take-up spool instead of around the center. I’m amazed I got anything, honestly, after the film came out of the camera wound all wrong and I had to step into a dark closet to re-roll it onto another spool, properly, and rubber-band it to take it to the lab. You can see some evidence of light leaks along the edges in the pseudo-contact sheet photo above.

The lens is clearly not sharp, the film plane is clearly not remotely flat. I’ll still write up my traditional review and show off the example photos, but don’t expect much. I won’t be using it again, though it may remain on my shelf awhile.

Holiday Craft Fair

Also mentioned that week was the Holiday Craft fair where I will be selling prints, which is now even closer. In fact, it’s Thursday.

If you’re in Denver (or feel like coming to town!) stop by and say hello. I’ll have some prints available for sale, and appropriate apparatus for ordering more and different prints. Also, there will be some great knit goods from Kate. Everything will be suitable for wrapping (’cause, you know, Christmas is coming…).

I will also have the behemoth Pentax 6×7 with me if you want to see what I make the pictures with. Of course, at this point I’m convinced no one will show up or buy anything, so: I dare you to come! Prove me wrong!


Holiday Craft Fair flyer
Share this flyer if you’d like to help me out! The Denver Post’s Holiday Craft Fair is Thursday, Dec. 3, 2015, in the lobby of the The Denver Post building at 101 West Colfax Avenue in Denver. (Provided by The Denver Post)
  • Duncan Waldron

    Hi Daniel; came here from your Emulsive interview, and have just buzzed through a few pages; pleasant reading. I share your love of the -Mat; it was my first serious camera (loaned by Dad), and I used it for a year or two before moving on to 35mm. Well, Dad died in 2010, and I’ve inherited the -Mat and the Electro 35 GSN, and I can hardly wait to get my hands on them (my brother has them, on the other side of the world).

    I’d love to have the chance to shoot with a Rollei, but until then, I’ll be happy with my Yashica-friend :)

    Now, what else have you got here..?

    • Had a similar discussion on Twitter this week. Much as I’d like a Rollei, I don’t think I’d go there unless I could really get the one I want. In the meantime, Yashicas are such good copies I can get a feel for what options I like and satisfy my TLR urges quite effectively.

      I was much less impressed with the Electro 35, but I would still say it’s a good camera. I’d buy something else if I had to choose, but if it had been my dad’s, I’m betting I’d have been a lot more biased!

      There’s a lot of stuff on my site, though some is old and some is garbage. Keep pawing around, though, you’ll find all kinds of things and more coming all the time. Heck, if you want to take the easy way out, head over to and sign up to get an email when I post something fresh.

      Thanks for dropping by! Hope you enjoyed the interview as much as I did. ;-)

      • Duncan Waldron

        The Electro seems to have a very good reputation, but the auto-only exposure would be one of my main objections – aside of it being an RF rather than SLR camera. They are very personal things, camera preferences: I used OM2s in my work years ago, and while they were very good cameras, were too small for my liking, unless you had a winder attached with the grip to hang on to. Much prefer the size of my Canon EF, and would no doubt like a Nikon F for the same reason.

        Subscribing now, and yes, I did enjoy the interview (mine’s somewhere in the pipeline) :)

        BTW: how was the craft fair for you? Did anyone lust after your 6×7?

        • Yeah, I don’t mind a RF for some things (the Olympus 35RC is tiny but fantastic!) The lack of manual exposure, in any camera, is pretty much a deal-breaker for me any more. Generally a fully electronic shutter (as in, batteries required to work) is a deal-break, too, but the P6x7 overwhelms my frustration about that one thing with other wondrous features and amazing performance.

          The whole OM series is mostly small, but the ones I’ve handled haven’t bothered me with their size. If you think that’s small, don’t even bother with the Pentax MV/ME/ME-Super (superb cameras, though!). The F/F2 are very comfortable in the hands, though, for sure. Not quite as tall as the Canon F/EF I don’t think, but fill the hands just as well.

          Looking forward to your interview! They are all so good, it’s been great to meet (via Twitter, at least) many of the subjects, discuss technique and whatnot, and see their inspiring photos.

          Craft fair was pretty good — I posted a detailed update last week ( ). The Yashica-Mat I set on the table was more of a hit than the 6×7, honestly, but both were subject to some Ooohs and Aaahs. :P